🔗 Share this article

Within the opening pages of Authentic: The Myth of Bringing Your Full Self to Work, speaker Jodi-Ann Burey raises a critical point: commonplace directives to “bring your true self” or “bring your full, authentic self to work” are not benevolent calls for individuality – they often become snares. Burey’s debut book – a blend of personal stories, investigation, societal analysis and conversations – attempts to expose how businesses take over individual identity, transferring the responsibility of corporate reform on to staff members who are already vulnerable.

Personal Journey and Wider Environment

The motivation for the publication lies partially in Burey’s own career trajectory: various roles across retail corporations, emerging businesses and in international development, interpreted via her background as a disabled Black female. The dual posture that Burey faces – a push and pull between standing up for oneself and seeking protection – is the engine of Authentic.

It emerges at a time of collective fatigue with institutional platitudes across the US and beyond, as backlash to diversity and inclusion efforts grow, and many organizations are cutting back the very systems that previously offered progress and development. The author steps into that terrain to contend that backing away from authenticity rhetoric – that is, the business jargon that reduces individuality as a grouping of appearances, idiosyncrasies and pastimes, keeping workers focused on handling how they are seen rather than how they are handled – is not a solution; we must instead redefine it on our own terms.

Underrepresented Employees and the Display of Self

By means of colorful examples and discussions, Burey illustrates how marginalized workers – people of color, LGBTQ+ people, women workers, people with disabilities – learn early on to adjust which identity will “pass”. A vulnerability becomes a liability and people compensate excessively by attempting to look palatable. The effort of “showing your complete identity” becomes a display surface on which numerous kinds of assumptions are projected: emotional labor, revealing details and constant performance of appreciation. According to Burey, employees are requested to reveal ourselves – but lacking the defenses or the trust to survive what comes out.

As Burey explains, we are asked to reveal ourselves – but absent the safeguards or the reliance to withstand what arises.’

Illustrative Story: The Story of Jason

The author shows this situation through the story of an employee, a deaf employee who took it upon himself to inform his team members about the culture of the deaf community and communication norms. His willingness to discuss his background – an act of openness the office often commends as “genuineness” – temporarily made daily interactions more manageable. But as Burey shows, that progress was precarious. Once personnel shifts erased the unofficial understanding he had established, the culture of access dissolved with it. “Everything he taught left with them,” he comments exhaustedly. What was left was the weariness of needing to begin again, of being held accountable for an organization’s educational process. In Burey’s view, this illustrates to be told to reveal oneself absent defenses: to risk vulnerability in a system that praises your openness but fails to codify it into regulation. Sincerity becomes a snare when organizations count on individual self-disclosure rather than structural accountability.

Literary Method and Notion of Opposition

Burey’s writing is at once understandable and poetic. She blends scholarly depth with a manner of solidarity: an offer for audience to engage, to challenge, to disagree. For Burey, workplace opposition is not noisy protest but moral resistance – the practice of resisting conformity in settings that expect appreciation for simple belonging. To dissent, according to her view, is to question the accounts companies describe about fairness and belonging, and to reject engagement in practices that perpetuate inequity. It might look like naming bias in a meeting, choosing not to participate of uncompensated “equity” work, or setting boundaries around how much of one’s personal life is offered to the institution. Resistance, she suggests, is an affirmation of self-respect in spaces that typically praise compliance. It represents a discipline of integrity rather than defiance, a method of asserting that a person’s dignity is not based on corporate endorsement.

Reclaiming Authenticity

She also refuses rigid dichotomies. Her work avoids just eliminate “authenticity” completely: rather, she calls for its restoration. In Burey’s view, sincerity is not simply the unrestricted expression of individuality that business environment typically applauds, but a more intentional harmony between personal beliefs and personal behaviors – an integrity that resists manipulation by corporate expectations. As opposed to treating sincerity as a directive to overshare or conform to sterilized models of candor, Burey urges followers to keep the elements of it based on honesty, personal insight and moral understanding. From her perspective, the goal is not to discard genuineness but to relocate it – to move it out of the executive theatrical customs and toward interactions and organizations where confidence, fairness and responsibility make {